Legal Opinion
Haggart v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 28, 2009No. 09-103LPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
Before the court in this rails-to-trails case is plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class action for a class comprised of the named plaintiffs and other landowners who own reversionary rights to property previously used as a railroad in King County, Washington. Plaintiffs claim that operation of Section 208 of the National Trails System Act Amendments of 1983, Pub.L. No. 98-11, § 208, 97 Stat. 42, 48 (codified at 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d)) (“Trails Act”), “preclude[s] the [pjlaintiffs and similarly situated property owners from enjoying their ‘reversionary rights to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,265 Fred Zeidman and Steven Youngelson v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Haggart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Geneva Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Dauphin Island Property Owners Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.