Legal Opinion

Huggett v. Department of Natural Resources

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1999No. Docket 195548PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkey, J.

Defendant appeals as of right a declaratory judgment in favor of plaintiffs. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

In 1982, the state of Michigan, through defendant, deeded the wetland at issue to Michigan National Bank (mnb) in exchange for a parcel of land owned by mnb. The deed from the state to mnb included a condition that the land be used for peat farming and that if the condition were violated, the state had the right to reenter and retake the land. Plaintiffs later became owners of the wetland after mnb assigned its mortgage interest in the land to plaintiffs, and plaintiffs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jennings v. SouthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Board of County Road Commissioners v. SchultzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. International Business MacHines Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Grand Rapids Motor Coach Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Barrie v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Ditmore v. MichalikMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Huggett v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Papas v. Gaming Control BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Shelby Baumgartner v. Perry Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API