Barrie v. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Otsego. Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Mabston, 0. J.
It is to be regretted that we did not have the benefit of a careful'examination and argument by counsel upon what this court considers the important question in this case. Counsel seem to have conceded the validity of the condition, claiming simply that there had been a waiver thereof by the plaintiffs, the original grantors, and if not, that the defendant below was at all events entitled ■to be compensated for his improvements.
It is familiar doctrine and well settled that “ conditions subsequent are not favoured in law, and are construed strictly, because they tend to destroy…
2Cited by27 opinions
- Graves v. . DeterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Adams v. First Baptist Church of St. CharlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Clark v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Pepin County v. PrindleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.