Legal Opinion

Aldridge v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 20, 1973No. 411-66; No. 426-69PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

These cases come before the court on plaintiffs’ exceptions to a recommended decision filed November 24, 1972, by Trial Commissioner Mastin G. White pursuant to Rule 134(h). The court has considered the cases on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Since the court agrees with the decision, as hereinafter set forth, it hereby affirms and adopts the same as the basis for its judgment in this case. Therefore, plaintiffs are not entitled to recover and the petitions are dismissed.

*367OPINION OP COMMISSIONER

White, Oommissioner;

In these two civilian pay cases, which were consolidated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Edward William Rapp v. The United States. Ward Roland Hawkins v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  4. Farley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  5. Winsberg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Josephine Huskey v. Michael H. Trujillo, Director of the Indian Health Service, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  3. Sheets v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Spellman v. Fiscal Court of Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
  5. Ater v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API