Legal Opinion

Allen v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 3, 1983No. 47-82CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

OPINION

HARKINS, Judge.

These claims come for decision on defendant’s motion for summary judgment.1 Although no response to defendant’s motion for summary judgment has been filed, plaintiffs assert that the prior record of this *650case contains verification of the essential facts and sufficient response to defendant’s motion. Plaintiffs request a decision on the merits. Plaintiffs also request hearing on defendant’s motion and on their response to the November 22, 1982, order. Plaintiffs’ contention that the record is adequate for a decision on the merits…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Pilkenton v. Appalachian Regional Hospitals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1971
  4. Edward William Rapp v. The United States. Ward Roland Hawkins v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. Everett W. Moss v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chelan County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of ChelanWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Norton v. Worthen Van Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Sheets v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. McIntyre v. Division of Youth Rehabilitation Services, Department of Services for Children, Youth & Their FamiliesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
  5. Berry v. County of SonomaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API