Legal Opinion

Ater v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 26, 1984No. 707-81CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SETO, Judge.

This is an action by plaintiffs1 to recover overtime and premium pay compensation for time allegedly spent in standby status. A trial on the merits was held wherein, at *346the conclusion of plaintiffs’ case-in-chief, defendant moved for dismissal of this action, asserting that upon the facts adduced and the applicable law, plaintiffs had failed to show a right to relief. Subsequent to trial, defendant failed to file the required post-trial submissions within the enlarged time period granted by the court. Pursuant to Rule 55 of the Rules of the United States Claims…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LaMear v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  2. Truckee-Carson Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  3. Acton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Manning v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Favell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API