Legal Opinion

State v. Hornbeck

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1986No. 48926PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge."

Defendant, Ivan Doyle Hombeck, appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, for tampering with a witness. § 575.270 RSMo (Supp.1984). He was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to five years’ imprisonment.

Defendant claims on appeal the court erred (1) in admitting statements he made to police during a custodial interrogation after indicating his desire to remain silent, and (2) in overruling defense counsel’s objection to a remark by the prosecutor during closing argument. We reverse and remand.

Because defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Norman Stumes v. Herman SolemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. State v. CannadyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. State v. GrovesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. KneseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. State v. PetarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. State v. BogardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. McGeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. SteeleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API