Legal Opinion

Norman Stumes v. Herman Solem

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1985No. 81-1589PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

This case comes to this Court on remand from the United States Supreme Court. Solem v. Stumes, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 1338, 79 L.Ed.2d 579 (1984). In our earlier decision, 671 F.2d 1150 (1982), we applied the per se rule of Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), to exclude confessions that Stumes made without the presence of counsel after he had invoked his right to counsel. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the per se rule of Edwards is not retroactive and should not have been applied to bar the admission of Stumes’s confessions.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. State v. MeaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. United States v. Jose Leon BarahonaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Willie BoydCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. People v. MickleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API