Legal Opinion
State v. Moore
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 1985No. 84-542PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.
The question posed by this appeal is whether an unarmed accomplice to an armed robbery, convicted of violating R.C. 2911.01(A)(1), is subject to the enhancement provision of R.C. 2929.71 as it existed prior to the amendment of R.C. 2929.71 effective July 1, 1983.
Prior to July 1, 1983, R.C. 2929.71 read in part as follows:
“(B) The court shall impose a term of actual incarceration of three years in addition to imposing an indefinite term of imprisonment pursuant to section 2929.11 of the Revised Code if the offender is convicted of, or pleads guilty to, a violation of division (A)(2) of section…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. GravenOhio Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. HanningOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ChapmanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- State v. Kimble, 06 Ma 190 (3-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.