State v. Graven
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Bbown, J.
Our allowance of, the: appellant’s motion for leave to appeal concerns only the two pointy, of law hereafter discussed. We have examined other errors assigned in the Court of Appeals and find theim properly disposed of by that court’s opinion. s
The; ¡appellant argues .that by sending the indictment to the jury for its use during deliberation, the trial eoupt has violated the appellant’s statutory rights under-R. C.-2945.-35, which provides: ...
“Upon retiring for deliberation, the jury,, at the discretion of. the court, may take with'it all papers, except depositions, and all articles,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. RosotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- United States v. PressCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- State v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Lacy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SpisakOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SingletonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.