State v. Chapman
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
This case raises the question of whether an unarmed ac*42complice to an armed robbery, convicted of violating R.C. 2911.01, may be sentenced to a mandatory three-year term under the enhancement provision of R.C. 2929.71. This court previously held that unarmed accomplices were subject to R.C. 2929.71 as it read prior to July 1,1983. State v. Moore (1985), 16 Ohio St. 3d 30. We now reach the same conclusion with regard to the current version of R.C. 2929.71.
R.C. 2929.71(A) provides:
“The court shall impose a term of actual incarceration of three years in addition to imposing a life sentence…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. HanningOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. CappOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. RuckerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.