Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Williams

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1986No. 111 and 112PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from the sentence of the trial court by which both appellees were given concurrent indeterminate sentences under the “Youthful Offenders Act”. 61 P.S. § 485. Appellees pleaded guilty to robbery, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3701(a)(l)(i) and (ii) and criminal conspiracy, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 903, arising from their accosting and striking a victim and taking $3.50 from him. Appellee Williams threatened the victim with what was later discovered to be a pellet gun. This fact is not contested.

In compliance with the section of the Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Act…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. LaytonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. LawrenceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. StalnakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. ChiariSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API