Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Chaney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 13, 1942No. 30545PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
This action was instituted by Nora Chaney, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover on an attachment bond for damages alleged to have been sustained as the result of wrongful attachment.
The facts which gave rise to the litigation will be briefly stated. In June 3, 1940, John J. Turner, doing business as Turner Funeral Home, instituted an action in the district court of Stephens county against the said Nora Chaney to recover on an account alleged to be due and caused an attachment to be issued and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Leasure v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- City of Altus v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- First State Bank of Mannsville v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Stumpf v. PedersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Osburn v. Bendix Home Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Bunch v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- A. C. Israel Commodity Co. v. Banco Do Brasil, S. A.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- ABC Construction Co. of Oklahoma v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959