Legal Opinion

First State Bank of Mannsville v. Howell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 6, 1913No. 2823PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from County Court, Marshall County; J. W. Falkner, Judge. Action in replevin by tlie First State Bank of Mannsville against J. L. Howell and others to recover possession of a team of mules for the purpóse of foreclosing a chattel mortgage thereon. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

On December 15, 1908, one J. B. Wall, a merchant, sold to J. E. Howell two mules for $275, said sum to be paid October 1, 1909. On the same day the said J. E. Howell executed and delivered to the said J. B. Wall two promissory notes, secured by chattel mortgage on the said mules and other property, one in the sum of $275, the other in the sum of $219.93, which said notes were also signed by Chas. Lewis, as surety. Wall, the merchant, was indebted to plaintiff in error in the sum of $2,400 in the month of December, 1908, and shortly after the execution of the notes by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. . ColverNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Bell v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  4. Rice v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Thomas v. RaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Parsons v. EiseleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. MacKey v. BoswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Williams v. Gibson Bros.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Craighead v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Cushman Motor Works Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API