Legal Opinion
Stumpf v. Pederson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 29, 1937No. 27248PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an action to recover damages for wrongful attachment of an automobile. The ease arose as follows: Lucy C. Pederson and Oleta Hubbard, plaintiffs, were operating a cold drink and lunch stand near Crescent, in the oil field, which is about 15 miles from Guthrie. They lived in Guthrie, and used the automobile to drive to and from the place of business. On December IS, 1933, while they were in Oklahoma City to appear before the Tax Commission, pursuant to a subpoena, J. M. Stumpf sued them in the justice court in Oklahoma City and attached the automobile, which belonged to Oleta Hubbard.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keener Oil & Gas Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Bokoshe Smokeless Coal Co. v. BraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Wellington v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Bash v. HowaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Reliable Mut. Hail Ins. Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sheetz, Inc. v. Bowles Rice McDavid Graff & Love, PLLCWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Ames v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Tax/Investments Concepts, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- R. Muñiz de León & Co., S. en C. v. Melón Hnos. & Cía., S. en C.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
- Ames v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.