State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Williams
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Justice.
In this declaratory judgment action, appellant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) seeks to avoid its duties of defense and indemnity under a homeowner’s insurance policy issued to respondent Harry Keller. In a separate action brought by Tony Williams (the main action), Williams alleges that Keller assaulted and battered him and inflicted emotional distress by committing nonconsensual sexual acts upon him. 1 The trial court held that State Farm had duties to defend and indemnify respondent in the main action and further that State Farm had a duty to pay…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Continental Western Insurance v. ToalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Caspersen v. WebberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Republic Vanguard Insurance Co. v. BuehlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. SippleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. S.S.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Horace Mann Insurance v. LeeberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- Linebaugh v. BerdishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Rodriguez v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Garvis v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.