Legal Opinion

Figure Eight Beach Homeowners' Ass'n v. Raymond Clifton Parker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1983No. 825DC738PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Defendants’ sole exception is to the entry of judgment by the trial court in this matter. Defendants assign as error the trial court’s granting of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denial of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. On appeal defendants advance three questions:

I. Is restrictive covenant number 8 of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants for Figure Eight Island Company unenforceable due to its vagueness, uncertainty, and failure to state an ascertainable standard?

II. Are the restrictive covenants upon which the plaintiff-appellee relies enforceable only…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Beech Mountain Property Owner's Ass'n v. SeifartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Snug Harbor Property Owners Ass'n v. CurranCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. In the Matter of Will of EdgertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Hall v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Ledges Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Allen v. Sea Gate Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. WILLOW BEND HOMEOWNERS ASS'N, INC. v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. McGinnis Point Owners Ass'n v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Parker v. Figure "8" Beach Homeowners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API