Legal Opinion

Van Poole v. Messer

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 25, 1973No. 7319SC449PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Summary judgment is proper only where there is no genuine issue of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Kiser v. Snyder, 17 N.C. App. 445, 194 S.E. 2d 638 (1973), cert. denied, 283 N.C. 257. The party moving for summary judgment has the burden of establishing the lack of a genuine issue of material fact, and in that regard, the papers of.the opposing party are indulgently regarded.’ Singleton v. Stewart, 280 N.C. 460, 186 S.E. 2d 400 (1972).

We are of the opinion that the trial judge committed error in entering summary judgment in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Timmerman v. GabrielMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Chisholm v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Tull v. Doctors Building, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lassiter v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In the Matter of Will of EdgertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. McGinnis Point Owners Ass'n v. JoynerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Barber v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Cain v. PowersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API