Legal Opinion
Empey v. Industrial Commission of Utah
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1937No. Nos. 5778, 5779PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELIAS HANSEN, Chief Justice.
Each of the plaintiffs herein applied to the Industrial Commission of Utah for compensation which was denied, whereupon the causes were brought to this court for review. Both causes grow out of the same accident. When presented to this court the causes were consolidated. We shall dispose of both of them in this opinion. Compensation was denied for these reasons: (1) That neither the husband of plaintiff Mattie Empey nor plaintiff Rosamond Snow was in the employ of the Escalante Explorations, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Escalante Company, at the time of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cox's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Matter of Larsen v. . Paine Drug Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Employers' Indemnity Corp. v. FelterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- West Chandler Farms Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Barber Asphalt Corporation v. Industrial Comm.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
- Bates v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Diamond Ice Co. v. SeitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.