Legal Opinion
Diamond Ice Co. v. Seitz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 17, 1940No. 29256PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.
This is an original proceeding brought by Diamond Ice Company, a partnership, and its insurance carrier, Casualty Reciprocal Exchange, seeking to obtain a review of an award made in favor of Clarence S. Seitz, hereinafter referred to as respondent.
On the 11th day of February, 1938, Clarence S. Seitz filed employee’s first notice of injury and claim for compensation, alleging that on December 21, 1937, he sustained an injury while in the employ of the Diamond Ice Company by falling from a scaffold onto a concrete platform. The nature and extent of disability are not in dispute.
On May 8, 1939,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Purkable v. Greenland Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
- Matter of Larsen v. . Paine Drug Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Smith & McDannald v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Shepard v. CrumbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Murphy v. Chickasha Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Preferred Accident Ins. Co. of N. Y. v. Van DusenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- McDuffie v. Nash Neon Sign Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Carper v. BrandonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Aycox v. Pepsi Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.