Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ralston v. Turner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1942No. 31279PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

The relator brought this original action to obtain a writ of mandamus against the clerk of the supreme court and secretary of the state bar commission, to compel him, as an administrative officer, to accept and file the application of the relator to take the state bar examination.

It is not questioned that the relator possesses all of the qualifications and made the proper application to take the state bar examination, as provided for in L.- B. 114, an amendment to section 7-102, Comp. St. 1929 (Comp. St. Supp. 1941, sec. 7-102). The application, together with a tender of the fee therefor, was…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. O'Donoghue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. New York Ex Rel. Bryant v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. In re CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Heiberger v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Ruckenbrod v. MullinsUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hackin v. LockwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. Sadler v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. JoubertNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API