Legal Opinion
Ruckenbrod v. Mullins
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1943No. 6498PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLFE, Chief Justice.
The respondent, Richard Ruckenbrod, an attorney duly licensed to practice in the State of Utah, was appointed by the City Court of Salt Lake City to defend an indigent defendant, Theodore Pacheco, on a charge of second degree burglary. Ruckenbrod appeared before the City Court at a preliminary hearing, interviewed Pacheco several times, and represented him at the trial in the District Court. At the close of a one day trial, the District Judge ordered Salt Lake County to pay Ruckenbrod $75 for services rendered in the defense of Pacheco. When Salt Lake County refused to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Adair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. Edward J. Dillon, Petition of Manley B. StrayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Allied American Mutual Fire Insurance v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- State v. CrankUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- McKenzie v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Melvin Leroy Tyler v. Warden Lark Norton Y. Beilenson v. Treasurer of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.