Legal Opinion
Heiberger v. Clark
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 21, 1961PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action against the members of the bar examining committee of the state of Connecticut for a judgment declaring that he was entitled, unconditionally, to take the examination given in December, 1957, for admission to the bar and that he is now entitled to admission to the bar. He alleges, in substance, that he has complied with all the requirements for admission other than those imposed by subsections fifth, sixth and seventh of § 4 of the rules of the Superior Court concerning the admission of attorneys; Practice Book § 4; 1 and that he lias fulfilled the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- In re DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- In re CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Norwalk Street Railway Company's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- In Re DurantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Daily v. New Britain Machine Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Gentile v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.