Legal Opinion

United States v. Kent

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 8, 2011No. 10-10011PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Jay Kent’s appeal of his conviction and sentence for drug distribution offenses requires us to decide two questions: First, once a defendant has stated before the district court his or her intention to enter a guilty plea, is it an abuse of that court’s discretion to accept a prosecutor’s filing of enhanced charges against the defendant? Second, does a prosecutor act with impermissible vindictiveness when he or she makes good on a plea bargaining threat to enhance charges against a defendant, despite the defendant’s willingness to plead guilty unconditionally?…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API