United States v. Kent
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Jay Kent’s appeal of his conviction and sentence for drug distribution offenses requires us to decide two questions: First, once a defendant has stated before the district court his or her intention to enter a guilty plea, is it an abuse of that court’s discretion to accept a prosecutor’s filing of enhanced charges against the defendant? Second, does a prosecutor act with impermissible vindictiveness when he or she makes good on a plea bargaining threat to enhance charges against a defendant, despite the defendant’s willingness to plead guilty unconditionally?…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011