Legal Opinion
United States v. Kent
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 24, 2011No. 10-10011Published
1Opinion of the Court
649 F.3d 906 (2011)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jay KENT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 10-10011.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted November 2, 2010.
Filed February 8, 2011.
Amended May 24, 2011.
Barry J. Portman, Federal Public Defender, and Daniel P. Blank (argued), Assistant Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-appellant Jay Kent.
Joseph P. Russoniello, United States Attorney, and Amber S. Rosen (argued), Assistant United States Attorney, San Jose, CA, for plaintiff-appellee United States of America.
Before: RONALD M. GOULD and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Jacobson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.