Legal Opinion

Wallender v. Michas

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1970PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $4,800.

Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to strike testimony by one of plaintiff’s doctors that her alleged difficulty in controlling her left hand was a “conversion hysterical response.” In support of this assignment defendant contends: (1) Plaintiff’s complaint only alleged “mental anguish,” which did “not apprise defendant” that plaintiff suffered a “conversion hysterical response;” (2) plaintiff’s doctor did “not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrill v. RountreeOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Miller v. LillardOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Derrick v. Portland Eye, Ear, Nose & Throat HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Timeus v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Banaitis v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. CraceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API