Legal Opinion

Derrick v. Portland Eye, Ear, Nose & Throat Hospital

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1922PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBb.own, J.

The defendant assigns error because of the court’s refusal to grant a nonsait. Section 182, subdivision 3, of oar Code, provides that—

“A judgment of nonsait may be given against the plaintiff as provided in this chapter * * when, upon the trial, the plaintiff fails to prove a cause sufficient to be submitted to the jury.”

The court refused to allow the motion for nonsait, whereupon the defendant offered evidence in its own *94behalf, and, at the conclusion of the testimony, moved for a directed verdict, which was denied, and the court’s ruling thereon is also assigned as error.

It is a doctrine so…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. UrlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Keyes v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  3. State v. FarnamOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. State v. HatcherOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Weygandt v. BartleOregon Supreme Court · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Gordon v. Curtis Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Sexton v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Egli v. HuttonOregon Supreme Court · 1931

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API