Derrick v. Portland Eye, Ear, Nose & Throat Hospital
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBb.own, J.
The defendant assigns error because of the court’s refusal to grant a nonsait. Section 182, subdivision 3, of oar Code, provides that—
“A judgment of nonsait may be given against the plaintiff as provided in this chapter * * when, upon the trial, the plaintiff fails to prove a cause sufficient to be submitted to the jury.”
The court refused to allow the motion for nonsait, whereupon the defendant offered evidence in its own *94behalf, and, at the conclusion of the testimony, moved for a directed verdict, which was denied, and the court’s ruling thereon is also assigned as error.
It is a doctrine so…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. UrlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Keyes v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- State v. FarnamOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. HatcherOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Weygandt v. BartleOregon Supreme Court · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Gordon v. Curtis Bros.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Sexton v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Egli v. HuttonOregon Supreme Court · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.