State v. Crace
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for criminal mischief in the first degree, ORS 164.365. On November 19, 1975, employes of Wimer Logging Company, Inc., discovered that several pieces of logging equipment had been damaged during the previous night. Most of the damage had been inflicted by bullet shots. Defendant was subsequently charged with the offense and convicted by a jury. ORS 164.365 provides:
"(1) A person commits the crime of criminal mischief in the first degree if, with intent to damage property, and having no right to do so nor reasonable ground to believe that he has such…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- State v. StantonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. HamblinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. RoundsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. Aguirre-RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. GoudeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.