Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Roe v. Halbig

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided November 20, 2018No. H043248PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.

*292Wolfgang Halbig sued five "John Doe" defendants in Florida for defamation for comments made about him on websites and social media sites. To determine the identities of the posters of the allegedly defamatory statements, Halbig served a subpoena on Google requiring the production of documents and information revealing *108the identity of the person maintaining http://sandyhookanalysis.blogspot.com. Google, in turn, notified the account holder of the subpoena. That person, described here as John/Jane Roe, filed a petition to quash the subpoena (motion to quash) under Code of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. A&B Market Plus, Inc. v. Arabo CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. A&B Market Plus, Inc. v. Arabo CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Baer v. TedderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. Del Biaggio v. BansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  5. Doe v. McLaughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API