Legal Opinion

Doe v. McLaughlin

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 21, 2022No. A161534Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 9/21/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO JOHN/JANE DOE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RYAN McLAUGHLIN, A161534 Defendant and Respondent. (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CPF-18-516431) Forty-four years ago our Supreme Court admonished that “The purpose of litigation is to resolve participants’ disputes, not compensate participating attorneys. Our courts are sufficiently burdened without combat kept alive solely for attorney fees.” (International Industries, Inc. v. Olen (1978) 21 Cal.3d 218, 224.)…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API