Legal Opinion

Guar. Mtg. Co. of Nashville v. Bryant

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1943PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeHaven

Defendants classified complainant as an “employer,” within the meaning of the Tennessee Unemployment Compensation Act, Michie’s Tenn. Code, 1938, section 6901 (1) et seq., and assessed it as such in the amount of $312.57, which complainant paid under protect. Thereafter complainant filed its original bill herein and averred that it was not liable for any assessment, because it did not come under the Unemployment Compensation Act, not having the requisite number of employees, and sought a judgment for the amount paid.

The chancellor granted the relief sought, and defendants have appealed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fuller Brush Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  2. A. J. Meyer & Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Texas Co. v. Bryant, Com'r.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rahoutis v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. California Employment Stabilization Commission v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Realty Mortgage & Sales Co. v. Oklahoma Employment Security Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Seattle Aerie No. 1 of Fraternal Order of Eagles v. Commissioner of Unemployment Compensation & PlacementWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Beal v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API