Legal Opinion

Fuller Brush Co. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1940No. 6163PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

This is an original proceeding to review a decision of the Industrial Commission of Utah holding in effect that the defendant, Lamont Holst, was an employee of the Fuller Brush Company, and affirming an order of Floyd T. Atkin, Appeals Examiner of the Unemployment Compensation Division of the Industrial Commission directing the Fuller Brush Company “to file a wage and separation report and pay into the Utah Unemployment Compensation Fund the necessary contributions on wages earned by the claimant while in the company’s employ.”

The plaintiff presents two questions: (1) Is the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  2. Creameries of America, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Texas Co. v. WheelessMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Globe Grain & Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. National Tunnel & Mines Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. A. J. Meyer & Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Rozran v. DurkinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Singer Sewing MacH. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Meredith Publishing Co. v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API