Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

California Employment Stabilization Commission v. Morris

California Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1946No. L. A. No. 19368PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The California Stabilization Commission asserts that in 1940 and 1941, certain salesmen and brokers associated with Everett Marshall Morris, a licensed real estate broker, were “in employment” within the meaning of the Unemployment Insurance Act (Stats. 1935, p. 1226, as amended; 3 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 8780d) and sued for contributions assessed accordingly. The appeal from the judgment in favor of Morris presents for decision the question as to the status of these persons.

There is no conflict in the evidence. During the period for which contributions are claimed, Morris, doing business…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Matter of Sullivan Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. A. J. Meyer & Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Tieberg v. Unemployment Ins. App. Bd.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Isenberg v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. DotsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Gipson v. Davis Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Edwards v. CaulfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API