Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hunt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1912No. 7,652PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prom Miami Circuit Court; Joseph N. Tillett, Judge. Action by Walter D. Hunt against Marshall Smith and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtLaiky, J.

— Appellee brought this action in the court be*594low to recover damages from appellants for the breach of a parol warranty alleged to have been made by them in the sale or trade of a stallion. From the averments of the complaint it appears that appellee was the owner of a stock of goods of the value of $2,500; that some time in January, 1909, he entered into a contract with appellants, whereby he agreed to deliver to them said stock of merchandise in exchange for a certain stallion, named Charlie, valued in the trade at $1,200, an automobile, and $500 in cash, and said trade was fully…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nysewander v. LowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Shirk v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Reynolds v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. McAroy v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Diven v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National City Bank v. KirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Funkhouser Equipment Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  3. Loer v. NEALIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Newman v. HuffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Valdenaire v. HenryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API