Legal Opinion

Diven v. Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1889No. 13,370PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Olds, J. —

On the 9th day of August, 1883, the appellants, Charles E. and William S. Diven, and the appellee, William H. Johnson, entered into a written contract by which Diven and Diven leased to Johnson certain real estate situate in Madison county, and described in the contract, for the term of one year from March 1st, 1884, on the conditions stated in the contract, which are substantially as follows: Johnson to farm, in good farmer-like manner, all of the farm, and to put in such crops and kinds of grain as Diven and Diven may direct; to keep fence-corners and along ditches mowed clear of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . DeenNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. ForsythIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Welz v. RhodiusIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Carr v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Welshbillig v. DienhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Western Paving & Supply Co. v. Citizens' Street RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Tracy v. Union Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  4. Pickett v. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API