Reynolds v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Putnam Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, C. J.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of the appellee, The Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Bailway Company, on its separate demurrer to the appellants’ complaint, and in favor of the other appellees, Porter Skinner and The Fort Wayne, Terre Haute and Southwestern Bailroad Company upon motions made by them to quash the process. The principal error alleged and discussed is that the circuit court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the several paragraphs of the complaint alleging insufficiency of the facts. Four paragraphs of complaint were filed, but the second was dismissed by the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Simson v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Conant v. National State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Knight & Jillson Co. v. CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Globe Motors, Inc. v. Studebaker-Packard CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Irwin's Bank v. Fletcher, Etc., Trust Co., Rec.Indiana Supreme Court · 1924
- Smith v. McClainIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Wolf v. FrankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.