Legal Opinion

Fetty v. Wenger

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 31, 2001No. 47246-1-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

— Robert Fetty sued his former clients, Ron and Diane Wenger, for attorney fees after they prematurely terminated his services. The trial court dismissed the action on grounds that the statute of limitations had expired. Because the Wengers acknowledged their obligation to Fetty, we hold that the statute of limitations was extended, and reverse.

I

Ron Wenger, acting on behalf of a potential heir to a multimillion dollar estate, hired Robert Fetty to represent the interests of the heir. Wenger and Fetty entered into a contingent fee agreement. Eventually, Wenger became dissatisfied with Fetty’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kimball v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Cannavina v. PostonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Griffin v. LearWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Belcher v. Tacoma Eastern RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Bank of Montreal v. GuseWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KageleWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against KageleWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In re the Estate of WimberleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Tragopan Properties, LLC v. Smith Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Jared Karstetter & Julie Karstetter, Resps v. King County Corrections Guild, PetsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API