Legal Opinion

Schafer v. JLC Food Systems, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 28, 2005No. A03-779PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, J.

Appellant Karen Schafer seeks review of the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents, JLC Food Systems, Inc., d/b/a Perkins Family Restaurant, and The Restaurant Company, d/b/a Foxtail Foods, in her negligence action alleging that her throat was injured as a result of eating a defective food product — a pumpkin muffin — at a Perkins restaurant. The court of appeals affirmed the district court’s decision, holding that Schafer could not prove a prima facie claim of negligence because she could not identify the object that injured her. Schafer asks us to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Ex Parte Morrison's Cafeteria of Montgomery, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Larson v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Kapps v. Biosense Webster, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
  3. Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Mack v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  5. Mullins v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API