Legal Opinion

Mix v. Ingersoll Candy Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1936No. L. A. 15623PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an appeal on the judgment roll alone from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action brought against them by plaintiff for damages for personal injuries resulting from the swallowing of a fragment of chicken bone contained in a chicken pie sold and served by the defendants to plaintiff in a public restaurant conducted by them.

Two causes of action were separately alleged in plaintiff’s complaint, one for damages for injuries resulting from an alleged breach of an implied warranty, the other for personal injuries resulting from the alleged negligence of defendants and their servants…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Race v. . KrumNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Travis v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Sun'n Sand, Inc. v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. CeballosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Goodman v. Wenco Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Zabner v. Howard Johnson's, IncorporatedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API