Legal Opinion

Larson v. Wasemiller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 16, 2007No. A05-1698, A05-1701PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

Appellants Mary and Michael Larson commenced this medical malpractice claim against respondent Dr. James Wasemiller, Dr. Paul Wasemiller and the Dakota Clinic for negligence in connection with the performance of gastric bypass surgery on Mary Larson. The Larsons also joined respondent St. Francis Medical Center as a defendant, claiming, among other things, that St. Francis was negligent in granting surgery privileges to Dr. James Wasemil-ler. St. Francis then moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The district court denied the motion to dismiss, holding that…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Garland Community Hospital v. RoseTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Thompson v. Nason HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Brookins Ex Rel. Gotcher v. MoteMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Paulino v. QHG of Springdale, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Mat-Su Valley Medical Center, LLC v. BolinderAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. LeBlanc v. Research Belton HospitalMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API