Legal Opinion
American Federation of Government Employees v. Office of Personnel Management
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 26, 1987No. Nos. 86-5456, 86-5457 and 86-5461PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILBERMAN, Circuit Judge:
The history of this case is protracted and much of it was reviewed in National Treasury Employees Union v. Devine, 733 F.2d 114, 115-16 (D.C.Cir.1984). Briefly, in March, 1983, the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) proposed new rules for implementing reductions-in-force (“RIFs”) that increased the importance of merit (as measured by the results of employee performance evaluations) and decreased the importance of seniority in determining which employees keep their jobs, which get transferred, and which are terminated. OPM also proposed to change the method of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- The Toilet Goods Association, Inc. v. John w.ga Rdner, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Office of Personnel Management National Treasury Employees Union v. Constance Horner, Director, Office of Personnel Management. National Federation of Federal Employees v. Constance Horner, Director, Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Saraco v. HallettDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- O'CONNELL v. HoveDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993