Legal Opinion
O'CONNELL v. Hove
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 17, 1993No. CV-92-5379PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
Plaintiffs 1 —employees of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”)— bring this action for overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., (“FLSA”), and the Federal Employees Pay Act (“FEPA”), 5 U.S.C. § 5542. They ground jurisdiction on 28 U.S.C. § 1331, federal question jurisdiction; 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), the jurisdictional grant of the FLSA; and 12 U.S.C. § 1819 (Fourth), the FDIC “sue and be sued” clause!
Plaintiffs are covered by a Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”) negotiated between the National Treasury…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- O'Connell v. Hove, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994