Legal Opinion
Davis v. University of the District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1992No. 89-1526PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALLAGHER, Senior Judge:
Appellant Davis’ position as an educational service employee of the University of the District of Columbia (“UDC”) was eliminated by a reduction in force (“RIF”). After the President of UDC denied his appeal, he sought review by the District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals (“OEA”) which dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction. The Superior Court of the District of Columbia affirmed OEA’s decision. Davis contends that the trial court erred in ruling that OEA lacked jurisdiction over his appeal, 1 and the denial of his due process rights to a hearing warrants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Kegley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Fucik v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kennedy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Jerome Management, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Fonville v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Martin v. District of Columbia CourtsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Thompson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.