Legal Opinion

William Whitman, Inc. v. York

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Manifestly, plaintiff’s assignments of error, based upon exceptions, with respect to the issues and to the holding as to the burden of proof, upon the first seven issues, cannot be sustained. Plaintiff’s consent that these issues should be answered by the jury, in accordance with the contentions of defendants, make it unnecessary to consider or to discuss the exceptions upon which these assignments of error are based.

The burden upon the first seven issues, involving exclusively matters alleged in the answer, upon which defendants contend that the notes sued on are invalid, was upon…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Worth Co. v. International Sugar Feed No. 2 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Mayers v. McRimmon.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Tyson v. Joyner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Manufacturing Co. v. . SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Combs v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1859

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Foxman v. . HanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. AtmoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Standard Inv. Co. v. Town of Snow Hill, N. C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  4. Bank of Statesville v. Black-Welder Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. In Re the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by BassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API