Clark v. Laurel Park Estates, Inc.

This is an action for rescission, tbe plaintiffs alleging actionable fraud.

Tbe record discloses tbat none of'the exceptions and assignments of •error except those above set forth is in accordance with tbe rules of this Court. Tbe exceptions to tbe charge should be made as pointed out in Rawls v. Lupton, 193 N. C., p. 428, at p. 432. It is there said: “Continuity of tbe charge is necessary with tbe ‘specific’ exceptions. Anything else is unfair to tbe trial judge — to have his charge cut up in piecemeal and disconnected.”

Tbe defendant, Laurel Park Estates, Inc., filed no answer to tbe…