Wood v. Citizens Bank
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
On tbe findings of tbe referee, approved by tbe trial court, wbi'cb are conclusive as tbey are not challenged for want of evidence to support them, we have discovered no exceptive assignment of error of sufficient merit to work a reversal of tbe judgment.
Tbe two circumstances which differentiate this ease from those cited and relied upon by appellant are, first, the fact that tbe $10,265.00 in question was embezzled from tbe bank by tbe deceased treasurer, and, second, tbe finding that said funds were used by tbe treasurer in bis capacity as such to discharge county obligations.
It is well…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Liles v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Agawam National Bank v. Inhabitants of South HadleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- Manufacturing Co. v. . SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Edwards v. . CulbersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- McNinch v. . Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- King v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- State Ex Rel. Roebuck v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Wilson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Wyatt v. SharpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Beaver v. Crawford Paint Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.