Legal Opinion

Porter & Peck v. West Construction Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

On the hearing before the referee it was agreed by the parties that all objections to evidence not set out in their briefs should be deemed withdrawn, and at the trial in term the judge found as a fact that pursuant to this agreement the defendant had waived its first eighteen exceptions and, moreover, had not objected to the referee’s report. As this finding is not subject to review we are not required to express an opinion on the merits of any of these exceptions.

The appellant requested this instruction; “The court further charges the jury that the contract between Porter & Peck and West…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . AshburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Patton v. Sinclaire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. State v. . ReaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Young v. . JeffreysSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Goodyear v. GoodyearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Cole v. Industrial Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Kearney v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Williams v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API