Edwards v. Floyd
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order granting defendants’ motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The action was for crop damage suffered by plaintiff as a result of defendants ’ interfering with plaintiff’s water supply.
This is the sole question presented for our determination:
Did the trial court abuse its discretion in granting the motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence for the reason that defendants failed to show that they had used “reasonable diligence” to discover and produce such evidence at the time of the trial?
This…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Slemons v. PatersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Ross v. SedgwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Forman v. GoldbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Butler v. VassaultCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Hutchason v. MarksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Pierce v. NashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Henningsen v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- De Felice v. TaborCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957