Butler v. Vassault
California Supreme Court
Appeal from tbe District Court of tbe- Fourth District, City and County of San Francisco. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Crookett, J.,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court; Temple, J., Wallace, J., and Bhodes, C. J., concurring:
Tbe appeal in tbis case is from an order sustaining a demurrer to tbe complaint. There were two grounds of de*75murrer assigned: first, a defect of parties plaintiff; and second, that tbe complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Tbe action is in the nature of a bill of review, and for a new trial in a former action brought by tbe defendant, Yassault, against one Austin and bis wife, to recover tbe possession of certain real estate. During tbe pendency of that…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Slemons v. PatersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Ross v. SedgwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Nicholson v. MetcalfMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- Edwards v. FloydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. StevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.