Legal Opinion
Whorton v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 21, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-1291PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
Re Document No.: 17
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Brenda Whorton, a former employee of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”), claims that she was denied training, promotion/selection, and other opportunities, and was subjected to sexual harassment and a hostile work environment, based on her race (white), gender (female), and in retaliation for complaining about her discriminatory treatment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bergbauer v. MabusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Najmah Rashad v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Congress v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Floyd v. LeeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Blackwell v. Sectek, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.